A valued colleague, Margaret Hansen (http://www.m2hnursing.com/) sent me a link to http://stigmergicweb.org/2006/10/20/the-myth-of-the-digital-native "Myth of the Digital Native". The author, Bob Wall, is a public school teacher in Saskatchewan. Bob questions the implied attribute of technical comptence that goes with the term "digital native".
I agree with many of his observations, particularly as I look at my students who range from 19 to adults embarking on a second career. While many of them are very comfortable using email, surfing, etc from the perspective of consumers, they are very much newbies when it comes to learning new applications, formulating search strategies and critically evaluating resources.
I don't know if a regional thing, but my undergrad nursing students seem uncomfortable with the idea of learning or interacting in Second Life, and very few will admit to playing games. Most of them are avid Facebook users, but listservs, online discussion boards and blogs are foreign to many of them.
He cites a Presnky quote in his posting: "Lest this perspective appear radical, rather than just descriptive, let me highlight some of the issues. Digital Natives are used to receiving information really fast. They like to parallel process and multi-task. They prefer their graphics before their text rather than the opposite. They prefer random access (like hypertext). They function best when networked. They thrive on instant gratification and frequent rewards. They prefer games to "serious" work."
Yes, they scan, write very informally and seem more interested in easily obtained, superficial information. Wikipedia is a primary information source for many of them. If I wander about our computer lab while lecturing, many have multiple windows open and flip between IM, email, Facebook, and my lecture notes. The biggest advantage I think the "natives" have is the willingness to experiment and a lack of fear they'll "break something" and they view electronic communciation and collaboration as normal rather than something new.
The caveat to using the term "digital natives" is to remember you can't make the assumption that comfort in the electronic environment and williness to explore equates with information literacy or technical competence.
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

4 comments:
Thanks for this post, Bill - it is really fortuitous. I have been 'subpoenaed' into a course about designing online education and our first task is to describe our learners. One of the thongs I want to get a handle on is what digital literacy really means. And the other thing I wish to dispel is the assumptions people make about digital literacy in relation to age ie if you're young, you are digitally literate./ I do not believe that is the case- just because you have a FB account, that does not make you DL, which is exactly what you are saying.
Funny thing is many of us "digital immigrants" are designing and delivering the courses used by the "digital natives". I find it amazing how many healthcare personnel who work with cutting edge technology get a "deer in the headlights" look when it comes to computers.
So, why is that, Bill?
Good question and I don't know the answer. Familiarity, looking for relevance to their job, ergonomic issues (user interface, colors, font size) all could be possibilities. Some research out there is showing the 50+ demographic to be one of the faster growing user populations so there's hope for us yet!
Post a Comment